Last modified: 2013-02-20 12:18:50 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T16699, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 14699 - More versatile searching in CheckUser log
More versatile searching in CheckUser log
Status: REOPENED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
CheckUser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 5 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: schema-change
Depends on: 13789
Blocks: SWMT
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-01 21:22 UTC by Mike.lifeguard
Modified: 2013-02-20 12:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Mike.lifeguard 2008-07-01 21:22:24 UTC
The current search function can search only for target and initiator, and cannot accept wildcards. Please allow wildcard or regex searching, and allow searching by wiki (once bug 13789 is done), and allow searching in the reason.
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2008-08-14 16:00:49 UTC
Hmm, a comment,time index will be needed here
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2008-08-14 16:03:05 UTC
Actually, at least two other indexes would be needed too, since the current ones are on user ID's. This is starting to become a bit much...
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2008-08-14 16:07:42 UTC
Bah, and the comment index needs to be fulltext, which needs a separate non-innodb table.

Closing this as it would be *too* much of a pain for not enough benefit.
Comment 4 Mike.lifeguard 2008-10-25 21:09:11 UTC
Are we sure we can't get a half-decent search on the target at least? That'd be really useful for cases where one doesn't remember the exact name.

Even if we don't get all the searchability we want, we could do with a bit more :)
Comment 5 John Mark Vandenberg 2009-09-09 11:09:18 UTC
In order to find recent concerns about a long time sock puppeter, the search form is useless at the moment.  This is necessary when doing audit work, and also considering ban appeals.

The only solution right now is to:
a) ask all checkusers if they have done recent related checks, or
b) load a log of the last year and search.
Comment 6 Marcin Cieślak 2013-02-20 09:06:01 UTC
Can you be more specific about the proposed use cases we don't cover currently?

How should a "ban appeal search" look like? How do "audit work" searches look like?

This might help to provide a faster and easier solution to most frequent problems.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links