Last modified: 2012-07-26 17:06:38 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 1437 - Adding HTML-Metadata in <link>-Tags?
Adding HTML-Metadata in <link>-Tags?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Parser (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement with 5 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 26520 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-01-30 22:31 UTC by chrissi
Modified: 2012-07-26 17:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description chrissi 2005-01-30 22:31:20 UTC
What about adding a possibility for setting the html-tags <link rel="next" ...>
etc. within a MediaWiki page? In wikipedia you coult make date-pages easier to
navigate. What about adding the document history to <link rel="alternative"
title="01-01-2000">?
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2006-02-12 23:33:24 UTC
This would be useful on wikinews for the RSS feed so that firefox could detect it.
Comment 2 telarson 2006-09-26 16:36:24 UTC
<link rel="bookmark" href="#majorSectionOfArticle"> seems to be an obvious
addition.  This would be quite beneficial to metadata-aware browsers.  Since
wiki already creates a "Contents" box dynamically, it should only be a couple
extra lines of code to put some links in the document head as well.
Comment 3 Chad H. 2009-12-29 09:45:34 UTC
While I do see some slight benefit to allowing the setting of these, I also know our <head> has grown way out of hand and adding even more stuff to it is not the way to cut it back. We keep saying "well this is only X more bytes, it won't matter." Well all of those bytes add up eventually and a line needs to be drawn.

I suggest drawing it here and closing WONTFIX.
Comment 4 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2010-12-31 22:07:14 UTC
*** Bug 26520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 matanya 2012-07-26 14:07:19 UTC
I tend to agree with Chad. Would someone else review this and close?
Comment 6 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2012-07-26 14:30:33 UTC
I think this would be something for an extension.

In regards to comment 1 - (Just for clarification) I don't think that's a particularly good idea anymore (To let users do that sort of thing, security implications and what not)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links