Last modified: 2008-05-20 22:38:35 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 14153 - Please enable autopromotion for flagged revisions on de.wp again
Please enable autopromotion for flagged revisions on de.wp again
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-05-16 17:03 UTC by P. Birken
Modified: 2008-05-20 22:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description P. Birken 2008-05-16 17:03:04 UTC
After the initial phase we would like to have another go at autopromotion. Please enable it again with the following values: 

$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['days'] = 60; # days since registration
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['edits'] = 200; # total edit count
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['excludeDeleted'] = true; # exclude deleted edits from 'edits' count above?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['spacing'] = 3; # spacing of edit intervals
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['benchmarks'] = 15; # how many edit intervals are needed?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['recentContentEdits'] = 10; # $wgContentNamespaces edits in recent changes
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['totalContentEdits'] = 30; # $wgContentNamespaces edits
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['uniqueContentPages'] = 10; # $wgContentNamespaces unique pages edited
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['editComments'] = 5; # how many edit comments used?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['email'] = true; # user must be emailconfirmed?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['userpage'] = true; # user must have a userpage?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['userpageBytes'] = 100; # if userpage is needed, what is the min size?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['uniqueIPAddress'] = true; # If $wgPutIPinRC is true, users sharing IPs won't be promoted
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['noSorbsMatches'] = false; # If $wgSorbsUrl is set, do not promote users that match

For the new variable I'd like 'neverBlocked'        => true, # Can user that were blocked be promoted?
Comment 1 DaB 2008-05-19 00:45:35 UTC
The edits are TOO low. 2.000 or above would be ok.
Comment 2 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-19 00:50:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The edits are TOO low. 2.000 or above would be ok.
> 
Was the above discussed or not? I was under the impression that it was. At any rate, the voting criteria is a lot less that 2000, that seems very high.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2008-05-19 00:58:25 UTC
That uniqueIPAddress thing looks pretty dreadful. Existence of other Wikipedians in the same house, workplace, university, or other DHCP pool disqualifies you? Very unwiki.
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-19 00:59:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> That uniqueIPAddress thing looks pretty dreadful. Existence of other
> Wikipedians in the same house, workplace, university, or other DHCP pool
> disqualifies you? Very unwiki.
> 

I presume there will still be the request page. So those users can still get the rights.
Comment 5 P. Birken 2008-05-19 07:02:53 UTC
On the request page, the following is done: check wether someone has been in the community for 60 days, done 200 edits in article namespace and not been blocked. If that is the case, the user gets the right. If he is in less days or has lower edits, he still can get the right simply by admindecision. 

I don't really care about the uniqueIPAdress-thing, we can turn it off. 
Comment 6 DaB 2008-05-19 13:40:12 UTC
It's a difference if a humen checks a user (then 200 edits are ok) or there is an automatism (then 200 is VERY TOO low). FlaggedRevs is useless, if I have to check the Editors now instead of the edits before.
Comment 7 P. Birken 2008-05-20 06:23:46 UTC
Yes, that's your opinion, it was discussed at length on [[de:WP:AN]] and on http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:Gesichtete_Versionen/Rechtevergabe#Automatische_Rechtevergabe.3F.3F and the consensus is to give it a try, although with tighter restrictions than before. 
Comment 8 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-20 06:58:13 UTC
To actually say "200 in main" requires a tweak the above config. Accounting for that and comment #5, we have:

$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['days'] = 60; # days since registration
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['edits'] = 200; # total edit count
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['excludeDeleted'] = true; # exclude deleted edits
from 'edits' count above?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['spacing'] = 3; # spacing of edit intervals
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['benchmarks'] = 15; # how many edit intervals are
needed?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['recentContentEdits'] = 10; # $wgContentNamespaces
edits in recent changes
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['totalContentEdits'] = 200; # $wgContentNamespaces
edits
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['uniqueContentPages'] = 10; # $wgContentNamespaces
unique pages edited
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['editComments'] = 5; # how many edit comments used?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['email'] = true; # user must be emailconfirmed?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['userpage'] = true; # user must have a userpage?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['userpageBytes'] = 100; # if userpage is needed, what
is the min size?
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['uniqueIPAddress'] = false; # If $wgPutIPinRC is true,
users sharing IPs won't be promoted
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['noSorbsMatches'] = false; # If $wgSorbsUrl is set,
do not promote users that match
$wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote['neverBlocked'] = true; # Can user that
were blocked be promoted?

Comment 9 DaB 2008-05-20 14:12:13 UTC
@Philipp: There was NO consensus, only a question what autopromotion is. So it's only YOUR option that it should be reanable!
Comment 10 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-20 14:34:07 UTC
Be nice folks ;)

Closing this for now.
Comment 11 Brion Vibber 2008-05-20 22:38:35 UTC
Done.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links