Last modified: 2008-05-16 22:29:28 UTC
Provide an other FlaggedRev boxes than the "Draft" and "[view draft]" ones for the case of a template change, what currently is resulting in "0 changes need review", see bug 13995! 1. If stable=0, do not show the current draft box then, telling something about "0 changes need review" 2. If stable=1, do not show "[view draft]", and do not show "The draft has 0 changes awaiting review." Show a note instead, that mentions the change of a template!
Bug 14033 ("Allow templates to get flagged; flagging should approve 0-review-needed articles") is more preferable, by the way!
*** Bug 14043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 14060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
My suggestion: Do a quick fix so that if the current version is sighted and a template is changed, the behavior is as follows: i) The UI still shows that the version is sighted, but the exapanded box has a different message saying that in comparison to the sighted version, templates or pictures may have changed. In a future step, we add the template namespace to the flaggable namespaces and show the last sighted template in a current sighted version.
(In reply to comment #4) > My suggestion: Do a quick fix so that if the current version is sighted and a > template is changed, the behavior is as follows: i) The UI still shows that the > version is sighted, but the exapanded box has a different message saying that > in comparison to the sighted version, templates or pictures may have changed. > > In a future step, we add the template namespace to the flaggable namespaces and > show the last sighted template in a current sighted version. > So maybe just change "The draft has 0 changes awaiting review." to "Template/image changes are awaiting review" or something?
Yes, would be enough. But it would be nice to know *what* content has changed [where, name it]. How do you know whether an image has been just optimized, or a templated was modified by one single character only?
Done in r34606.
Note: At [[:de:Blatt_(Graphentheorie)]] there is still shown "0 changes need review"...
#c8: This seems to have been caused by action=pure, as mentioned at [[:de:Hilfe_Diskussion:Gesichtete_und_geprüfte_Versionen#action.3Dpurge_setzt_gesichtet_Flag_zur.C3.BCck]]
Instance removed in r34946
