Last modified: 2008-09-04 08:47:15 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T16015, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 14015 - There is no mark-this-revision link if only the diff, not the page content, is shown
There is no mark-this-revision link if only the diff, not the page content, i...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Aaron Schulz
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Tes...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-05-07 15:49 UTC by Melancholie
Modified: 2008-09-04 08:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Melancholie 2008-05-07 15:49:59 UTC 
There is no sight-this-revision link if only the diff, not the page content, is shown!

You can configure in your Special:Preferences to only get a revision comparision, but no page content on diffs. It's used by experienced users pretty often, I think. Then no sight-it link is there.

See screenshot [[:de:Bild:Test-diff.jpg]]

Refs:
* [[:de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Gesichtete_Versionen#Sichtungs-Button_im_Diff]]
* [[:de:Hilfe_Diskussion:Gesichtete_und_geprüfte_Versionen#Versionsvergleich]]
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-07 15:52:52 UTC 
People need to see the content, really. Otherwise image/template vandalism is invisible.
Comment 2 Melancholie 2008-05-07 16:05:44 UTC 
Good point!
Comment 3 Melancholie 2008-05-10 21:48:39 UTC 
But if only the text was changed (no extra image/template change) it would be admissible, wouldn't it?
Comment 4 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-10 22:30:58 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> But if only the text was changed (no extra image/template change) it would be
> admissible, wouldn't it?
> 

Would seem to make the UI to inconsistent :)
Comment 5 Aaron Schulz 2008-09-04 08:47:15 UTC 
This was changed a while ago.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links