Last modified: 2008-05-07 15:25:59 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 13995 - If a template was edited, articles show wrong FlaggedRev box content
If a template was edited, articles show wrong FlaggedRev box content
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal minor with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-05-06 19:25 UTC by Melancholie
Modified: 2008-05-07 15:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Melancholie 2008-05-06 19:25:48 UTC
When editing [[:de:Vorlage:Gesprochene_Version]] for example, the FlaggedRev box of [[:de:Albert_Einstein]] will show "not sighted" and "0 revisions to be sighted", although being sighted!
Comment 1 Melancholie 2008-05-06 19:38:22 UTC
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history (current rev is/was marked as sighted)
But the box says something different if logged in!
See also [[:de:Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia#Bug_oder_Verst.C3.A4ndnisfrage_zu_gesichteten_Versionen]]

Is this related to Bug 13974?
Comment 2 Melancholie 2008-05-06 20:19:37 UTC
Note: The basic idea, that a template change will lead to *other* content, that was not yet sighted - resulting in a status change - is good.
But then on
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history
the latest revision should not be shown as "still sighted" (light blue)!

And/or if the template gets sighted by a user all those articles should get their status back!
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-06 22:26:11 UTC
This report seems a bit confused. Template/image sighting is not on, so that doesn't matter.

The reason the message shows slightly differently is because the current and stable version are no longer synced, however the page itself may still only have 0 pending edits.

What might be a good idea is to tweak the wording or something.
Comment 4 Melancholie 2008-05-06 22:48:03 UTC
Did you try it?

Steps:
1. Log in
2. Change [[:de:Vorlage:Gesprochene_Version]]
3. Go to [[:de:Albert_Einstein]] (where the most current revision seems to (suddenly) be not sighted anymore)
4. Log out
5. [[:de:Albert_Einstein]] shows: there is a more current rev
Comment 5 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-07 15:25:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Note: The basic idea, that a template change will lead to *other* content, that
> was not yet sighted - resulting in a status change - is good.
> But then on
> http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history
> the latest revision should not be shown as "still sighted" (light blue)!
> 
> And/or if the template gets sighted by a user all those articles should get
> their status back!
> 

Per #3. The history is correct. The tag also seems fine. It probably could just use better wording.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links