Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:05:27 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T15975, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 13975 - Latest quality revision not linked, only latest sighted one
Latest quality revision not linked, only latest sighted one
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
FlaggedRevs (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hau...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-05-06 12:37 UTC by Melancholie
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Melancholie 2008-05-06 12:37:26 UTC
You do link ?stable=1 and ?stable=0 to each other, see:
http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite
http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hauptseite&stable=0

But if there is a (maybe more correct) reviewed revision, nobody will know; unless he/she is examining ?action=history!

Address might be:
http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite?reviewed=1 (and not /w/index.php?title= ;-)
Comment 1 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-06 15:27:29 UTC
Sorry, what is this bug asking for?
Comment 2 Melancholie 2008-05-06 16:19:05 UTC
A link to http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hauptseite&oldid=25224

How to find a quality revision else, if there is a more current (but maybe worse) sighted one? You only can reach that older but more accurate "reviewed article" only by searching in the revision history, yet!

So, http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite has a reviewed revision. On Wikipedia an article would have been reviewed by a notable person (e.g. a professor), of course. This reviewed revision is probably more accurate than a "sighted" one that came later. A revision is sighted if there is no vandalism, but maybe content got added that would be declared as *wrong* by a specialist.
Comment 3 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-06 16:20:12 UTC
An admin edit the site message to have a stableid=best link if desired. That will go to the quality revision if there is one.
Comment 4 Melancholie 2008-05-06 16:27:47 UTC
Link: http://de.labs.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hauptseite&stableid=25224 (sorry, with parameter "stableid=" ;-)

Which message is it (to change the URL, not just the text)?
Shouldn't the standard be the way I described it? Most wikis will need to change this behaviour, maybe not knowing how.
Comment 5 Melancholie 2008-05-06 16:31:27 UTC
Oh, and I do not request a link to the quality rev *instead of*, *but additionally* to the link towards the checked/sighted rev!

Both should be easily *accessible* ;-)
Comment 6 Aaron Schulz 2008-05-06 17:15:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Oh, and I do not request a link to the quality rev *instead of*, *but
> additionally* to the link towards the checked/sighted rev!
> 
> Both should be easily *accessible* ;-)
> 

Right. This should be locally resolvable.
Comment 7 Melancholie 2008-05-06 22:18:05 UTC
Thanks bug 14001 I now understand! Good morning myself ;-)
There is a parameter &stableid=best :-)

Is there a help page anywhere, that is mentioning this?
How do non-developer know that?

Even http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs does not contain infos about that parameter(s).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links