Last modified: 2010-05-15 15:59:36 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T15525, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
Bug 13525 - Category Sorting Incorrectly
Category Sorting Incorrectly
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Categories (Other open bugs)
1.11.x
All All
: Normal minor (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-03-26 18:50 UTC by Eric Mainz
Modified: 2010-05-15 15:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Eric Mainz 2008-03-26 18:50:04 UTC
Among other things, we use our implementation of mediawiki 1.11.2 to store hundreds of contacts, which are then each categorized, by company, department, etc.  Normally (and until our upgrade over the weekend from 1.1.4 to 1.11.2) we could enter a category tag, followed by a "|" (Pipe) and then the way we would like to see it sorted in a category page.

A direct example would be to categorize a person, say John Smith as [[Category:Contacts|Smith, John]].  This would then allow the user to be listed under the "S" in categories, instead of the traditional "J" for John.

With the newer WYSIWYG editor, when you switch from the 'wikitext' display to the WYSIWYG view, it strips off the information after the "|", leaving the above example to only display as the following:  [[Category:Contacts]].

The workaround for the time being is to list these pages in reverse order (Meaning that the [[John_Smith]] page would need to be listed as Smith_John in order for it to be listed under the "S" listings on the category pages.

Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2008-03-26 19:31:09 UTC
This sounds like a problem with an unspecified third-party WYSIWYG editor extension...

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links