Last modified: 2010-05-15 16:03:25 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 13284 - Users should be able to use customized edittools
Users should be able to use customized edittools
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 9754
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
1.13.x
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-03-07 16:51 UTC by Meno25
Modified: 2010-05-15 16:03 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Meno25 2008-03-07 16:51:17 UTC
Summary says it all. Users should be able to use customized edittools. Sometimes a user would like to change his edittools. He should be able to do so without having to ask a sysop to change global edittools affecting the whole wiki. I  am not sure if devs have enough time/man power to implement a feature request like this but I think it would be helpful. Thanks.
Comment 1 Guillaume Paumier 2008-03-08 18:38:51 UTC
Isn't this already possible by editing one's monobook.js?
Comment 2 Huji 2008-03-09 16:22:43 UTC
No. JavaScript based solutions modify the editing tools after they are loaded. This means, for example, if a wiki is using a huge set of editing tools, the user has to wait for all of them (many kilobytes) to be downloaded, before the JavaScript solution modifies/hides them.
Comment 3 Brion Vibber 2008-03-10 19:20:34 UTC
Duping this to bug 9754.

See also some notes on bug 11130 about ajax-ifying the default edittools so they're loaded in a different way that may be nicer for the described cases.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9754 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links