Last modified: 2014-01-05 02:08:30 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 13205 - Ability to use hyperlinks in log summaries
Ability to use hyperlinks in log summaries
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 14892
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
History/Diffs (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-03-01 01:20 UTC by AGK
Modified: 2014-01-05 02:08 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description AGK 2008-03-01 01:20:20 UTC
At present, using [[wikilinks]] in any sort of log (e.g., block form, user rights interface, etc., renders fine in the relevant logs. However, using a hyperlink (including diffs) render as a non-formatted, raw url, rather than the [1] (assuming no pipped text, e.g. [ link] = link) which appears if inserting the hyperlink into an ordinary wiki page.

This results in both the logs being ugly, and a tedious copy-and-paste process to investigate links used in logs (especially diffs).

Example, a Bureaucrat on enwiki flags a bot, with a diff to the relevant Bot Approvals Group decision. The log entry renders in an ugly format, meaning anybody following up on the 'crat's actions are hindered. The result is an overall decrease in efficiency.

I am unsure why logs do not support hyperlinks, but I would be pleased to see it implemented. Is this enhancement possible? Cheers, --AGK
Comment 1 Huji 2008-03-01 08:48:15 UTC
I also think this feature is handy. Like other external links, a "nofollow" rule should be considered.
Comment 2 AGK 2008-03-01 11:37:05 UTC
That is a good point. Whilst spam links, etc., are not as big a worry, as most logs are used by those that should be considered trustworthy (the block form, sysops; the userrights form, 'crats, and now sysops with rollback; etc.), there are other logs—the upload form, accessibly by anybody with any account.

But yes, nofollow is something we'd need to factor in.
Comment 3 Alexandre Emsenhuber [IAlex] 2009-08-24 20:25:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14892 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.