Last modified: 2008-01-15 21:17:53 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 12646 - Extend oversight functionality to images
Extend oversight functionality to images
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 8196
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Oversight (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Brion Vibber
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-01-15 21:15 UTC by Larry Pieniazek
Modified: 2008-01-15 21:17 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Larry Pieniazek 2008-01-15 21:15:30 UTC
This is a feature request rather than a bug against a specific part of the software. 

Sometimes sensitive, slanderous, etc. information is in images rather than in text.

Admins can see deleted images just as they can see deleted text. I believe currently it requires developer/DB direct intervention to make a deleted image not visible to admins.

The feature request is to: Extend oversight functionality (conceptually) to images, so that (versions of) images that have been (conceptually) "oversighted" are not visible to admins, just as oversighted text revisions are not visible to admins. This should be able to be applied to all versions of the image, not just versions after the first, and even if there is only one version of the image. 

I recognise that images are handled differently than text so the implementation may be essentially a completely new implementation, but for ease of use, having the UI be similar would be useful. It is suggested that the same group ("oversighters") have access to this that has access to text/revision oversight. However a new group COULD be created, I suppose. I think that might be not as good a choice.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2008-01-15 21:17:53 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 8196 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links