Last modified: 2009-01-24 05:40:57 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 12574 - Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.
Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
1.12.x
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: patch, patch-need-review
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-01-10 08:47 UTC by Cobi
Modified: 2009-01-24 05:40 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Patch to enable bots to specify whether their edit is a bot edit. (3.39 KB, patch)
2008-01-10 08:47 UTC, Cobi
Details

Description Cobi 2008-01-10 08:47:42 UTC
Created attachment 4528 [details]
Patch to enable bots to specify whether their edit is a bot edit.

Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.  I have attached a diff that should enable this.  Bots can append &bot=0 to any rollback or edit URL to mark the edit as a normal edit.
Comment 1 Daniel Cannon (AmiDaniel) 2008-01-10 09:55:06 UTC
Committed in r29539.
Comment 2 Kimon Berlin (gribeco) 2008-09-17 03:19:54 UTC
Doesn't seem to work for me (my bot's edits always have the bot flag, even when I set "bot=0")... was that change reverted?
Comment 3 Kimon Berlin (gribeco) 2008-09-17 03:28:06 UTC
This may have been reverted in r29540.
Comment 4 Mike.lifeguard 2008-11-22 19:03:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Committed in r29539.
> 

So, would that patch need to be updated after the refactoring in r29540? That should be done and committed if so.
Comment 5 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-24 05:37:59 UTC
This appears to be in the code now
Comment 6 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-24 05:40:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> This appears to be in the code now
> 

Closing

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links