Last modified: 2009-01-24 05:40:57 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T14574, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 12574 - Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.
Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Page editing (Other open bugs)
1.12.x
All All
: Normal enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: patch, patch-need-review
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2008-01-10 08:47 UTC by Cobi
Modified: 2009-01-24 05:40 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Patch to enable bots to specify whether their edit is a bot edit. (3.39 KB, patch)
2008-01-10 08:47 UTC, Cobi 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Cobi 2008-01-10 08:47:42 UTC 
Created attachment 4528 [details]
Patch to enable bots to specify whether their edit is a bot edit.

Bots should be able to set whether their edit should be marked as a bot edit.  I have attached a diff that should enable this.  Bots can append &bot=0 to any rollback or edit URL to mark the edit as a normal edit.
Comment 1 Daniel Cannon (AmiDaniel) 2008-01-10 09:55:06 UTC 
Committed in r29539.
Comment 2 Kimon Berlin (gribeco) 2008-09-17 03:19:54 UTC 
Doesn't seem to work for me (my bot's edits always have the bot flag, even when I set "bot=0")... was that change reverted?
Comment 3 Kimon Berlin (gribeco) 2008-09-17 03:28:06 UTC 
This may have been reverted in r29540.
Comment 4 Mike.lifeguard 2008-11-22 19:03:00 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Committed in r29539.
> 

So, would that patch need to be updated after the refactoring in r29540? That should be done and committed if so.
Comment 5 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-24 05:37:59 UTC 
This appears to be in the code now
Comment 6 Aaron Schulz 2009-01-24 05:40:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> This appears to be in the code now
> 

Closing
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links