Last modified: 2014-05-20 12:19:43 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 12556 - Set file upload to autoconfirmed (meant is 4 days after account creation) Wikimedia-wide.
Set file upload to autoconfirmed (meant is 4 days after account creation) Wik...
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
All All
: Normal enhancement with 6 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: crosswiki, shell
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-01-08 22:44 UTC by Thomas Goldammer
Modified: 2014-05-20 12:19 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Thomas Goldammer 2008-01-08 22:44:16 UTC
Very often users just create an account to upload unnecessary or unwanted files. We delete around three of such files on Meta per day (cf., and on other projects this is a problem as well, because in most cases there is no license or source provided and the files have to be deleted. People just come and start to upload their stuff immediately.

Of course, all wikis must be allowed to opt-out of this per community decision, but anyway. It should be default that uploads are enabled only after 4 days (just as page moves). It maybe needs an official note of the foundation on this, I don't know. At least, I would be glad to get one.

Best regards,
Comment 1 spacebirdy 2008-01-08 23:40:38 UTC
Please note that this is also very often a vandalism problem!

IMHO Commons should be left out

Best regards.
Comment 2 JeLuF 2008-01-09 22:25:35 UTC
This is not the place for this discussion. Please find consensus in the community first, then file a bug report.
Comment 3 Thomas Goldammer 2008-01-10 22:13:00 UTC
I opened a thread here:
All who have already voted for this bug may please give their arguments or support there. Thank you.
Comment 4 Thomas Goldammer 2008-02-10 17:48:22 UTC
Discussion has shown a quite overwhelming support. (Link see Comment #3.) Please reconsider. --~~~~
Comment 5 Bryan Tong Minh 2008-02-10 19:25:29 UTC
I don't think there was consensus to enable this on Commons. Since when this was announced on Commons it was said that Commons would not be included on the proposal, it was not discussed here any further. I would ask to hold back this change on Commons to give us the time to discuss this first.

Comment 6 Mike.lifeguard 2008-02-17 18:51:00 UTC
Since Commons hasn't come to a quick consensus about this and needs more time, please exclude Commons, but proceed with the other wikis, for which consensus was gained at Meta. Commons will have to open a separate configuration request if they decide to follow suit. Thanks. Mike.lifeguard
Comment 7 Brion Vibber 2008-03-24 23:08:56 UTC
Set as sitewide defaults:
  user upload => false
  autoconfirmed upload => true

with exception for commonswiki:
  user upload => true
Comment 8 Brion Vibber 2008-03-24 23:12:01 UTC
Note that I wouldn't recommend using this sort of setting in the long-term; restricting contributions by default in this way is *very* un-wiki and extremely unfriendly to new, impressionable contributors.

I very, very strongly suggest that this be rolled back as soon as we have better flagging and patrolling systems for new contributions.
Comment 9 Thomas Goldammer 2008-03-25 08:54:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)

Sure. As soon as there is a possibility to hide uploaded images (or at least to block including them in other pages) as long as they are not patrolled, this setting is superflous, of course. >:O) Best regards, Th.
Comment 10 Tsepel Cory 2009-10-13 21:52:52 UTC
regarding as invalid
Comment 11 Chad H. 2009-10-13 21:54:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> regarding as invalid

This isn't INVALID, the other bug was. Please stop changing bug statuses unless you know what you are doing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.