Last modified: 2007-12-03 21:48:40 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 12177 - API/query: "rvrevids" error thrown for no good reason
API/query: "rvrevids" error thrown for no good reason
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
API (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal normal with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?act...
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-12-01 22:32 UTC by Bogdan Stancescu
Modified: 2007-12-03 21:48 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Bogdan Stancescu 2007-12-01 22:32:33 UTC
After a software update which occurred some time around 2007-11-30 16:47:40 UTC on the Romanian Wikipedia, accessing the URL associated with this bug (and all similar queries involving other revision IDs) results in the following error:

The revids= parameter may not be used with the list options (limit, startid, endid, dirNewer, start, end).

This used to work properly before the update, and I see no reason for the error since I'm not using any of those list options.

Unfortunately I don't know where to look for the MediaWiki version we're running, but I'm sure you can easily determine that. This prevents me from properly running an anti-vandalism tool which is used by 20 users on the Romanian Wikipedia.

If this is not actually a bug, then please let me know how I can use the new version of the API to retrieve that data. In case it's not obvious what I'm trying to do, I'm trying to read the timestamp and user for a specific revision of an article.

Thank you!
Comment 1 Roan Kattouw 2007-12-01 23:36:46 UTC
I noticed this already and fixed it in r28015, but it hasn't gone live yet. I've tried annoying people on IRC, but in the weekend people with access to the live servers (most notably Brion and Tim Starling) aren't on line. This should be fixed by Monday.
Comment 2 ais523 2007-12-03 15:15:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> I noticed this already and fixed it in r28015, but it hasn't gone live yet.
> I've tried annoying people on IRC, but in the weekend people with access to the
> live servers (most notably Brion and Tim Starling) aren't on line. This should
> be fixed by Monday.
> 

The revision ID appears to be wrong (that's a change to the Translate extension); what is the correct ID?
Comment 3 Roan Kattouw 2007-12-03 21:48:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> The revision ID appears to be wrong (that's a change to the Translate
> extension); what is the correct ID?
r28025, sorry, not r28015. It's already live, though. 


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links