Last modified: 2011-03-13 18:05:41 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 11961 - Database error in article history at Wikipedia article "History of Knitting"
Database error in article history at Wikipedia article "History of Knitting"
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest minor (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t...
: easy
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-11-13 11:35 UTC by Willow
Modified: 2011-03-13 18:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Willow 2007-11-13 11:35:04 UTC
The "earliest" edit for the English Wikipedia article, "History of knitting" appears to be out of order, referring to an edit that occurred probably two years after the true first edit, which is listed as the 2nd earliest edit.  

More specifically, the true first edit was done by user AmyNelson on 11 September 2004, whereas the false first edit was done by Daylilly probably around 10 March 2005 (by moving to the next and previous revisions) although it's listed in the article history as occurring on 4 January 2003.  If you could fix that, that'd be great! :)

Willow
Comment 1 Willow 2007-11-13 11:39:06 UTC
Oops, I see that I made a minor bug myself in my first paragraph! I meant to say that the Daylilly edit is listed in the database as having a date (4 January 2003) two years earlier than when it actually occurred (~10 March 2005).  Thanks!
Comment 2 Domas Mituzas 2007-11-13 11:51:17 UTC
unfortunately we used to have clocks skewed on our application servers back in 2005 :) due to revision IDs not being sequential it is pretty much pain to fix all that automatically, and we let it live. :)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links