Last modified: 2008-11-18 12:57:44 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 11728 - Unify layout of enhanced watchlist/recent changes
Unify layout of enhanced watchlist/recent changes
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
: easy, patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-10-21 14:07 UTC by FT2
Modified: 2008-11-18 12:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments
Patch moving the history link to the corresponding place (912 bytes, patch)
2008-02-11 17:04 UTC, Mormegil
Details

Description FT2 2007-10-21 14:07:35 UTC
The enhanced watchlist groups edits on a page together. At present it shows lines like:

Time  Page (4 changes) . . (+bytes) . . (hist) [list of editors]

What you SHOULD get is:

Time  Page (4 changes | hist) . . (+bytes) . . [list of editors]
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2007-12-03 21:57:31 UTC
While the above request is a little vague :) I think the point would be that this would make the grouped lines more consistent with the single-change lines which look like:

Time  Page (diff; hist) . . (+bytes) Username (Talk | contribs) (comment)

Note that currently the grouped lines also use a different message for the history link (eg showing as longer "(Page history)"), another inconsistency which can be remedied by using the same message.
Comment 2 FT2 2007-12-03 22:05:50 UTC
Yep, thats about what I meant :)
Comment 3 Mormegil 2008-02-11 17:04:41 UTC
Created attachment 4642 [details]
Patch moving the history link to the corresponding place

This patch (against the current trunk) makes the history link appear after the “N changes” message, inside the parentheses, just like in the ungrouped case.
Comment 4 Mormegil 2008-02-11 17:06:57 UTC
(Changing summary to a more descriptive one, +keywords)
Comment 5 Raimond Spekking 2008-11-18 12:57:44 UTC
Patch applied with r43672.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links