Last modified: 2007-09-11 21:17:17 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 11294 - Cannot access protected property in includes/
Cannot access protected property in includes/
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 11204
Product: MediaWiki extensions
Classification: Unclassified
SemanticForms (Other open bugs)
PC Linux
: Normal critical with 1 vote (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Yaron Koren
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-09-11 19:35 UTC by Purodha Blissenbach
Modified: 2007-09-11 21:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Purodha Blissenbach 2007-09-11 19:35:38 UTC
Fatal error: Cannot access protected property SMW_LanguageDe::$smwDatatypeLabels in /home/ ... /extensions/SemanticForms/includes/ on line 51
Comment 1 Yaron Koren 2007-09-11 19:50:44 UTC
I'm pretty sure this is happening because you're using SMW 1.0 pre-alpha; Semantic Forms doesn't yet support SMW 1.0. I'm marking this as a duplicate of bug #11204.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 11204 ***
Comment 2 Purodha Blissenbach 2007-09-11 20:28:02 UTC
Thank you for your quick response! 

Could well be as you say. We are using pretty current svn revisions, both updated yesterday early night. (Should not trunk branches be stable and fit together?)

Anyways, is there a known revision of both SMW and SF, going together, that we should be using best atm?

Is there an estimate available as to how long it will take for SMW 1.0 + SF be available and rather stable? just roughly thinking of days/weeks/months/next year, so as to adjust our various scheduled tasks accordingly, if possible.

We have made additional sf language files. Is it OK to commit them, or do you want them reviewed before?

Comment 3 Yaron Koren 2007-09-11 20:50:11 UTC
Yes, I agree that main trunk branches should be stable and fit together: you should tell that to the SMW developers, who are putting their unreleased, unstable code in SVN. :) Though, to be fair to them, the MediaWiki SVN system, which is what we're both using, doesn't allow for multiple branches, so they didn't have much of a choice.

If you use use SMW 0.7 instead, which is available for download from the Semantic MediaWiki site, and is what they recommend for downloading, everything should work fine.

I have no idea when SMW 1.0 will become the stable official version. The developers haven't said anything. I'm guessing another two or three months, but that's just a guess. I'm also guessing that Semantic Forms will support SMW 1.0 by the time that happens.

Yes, feel free to just commit the language files, no review necessary. Thank you very much!
Comment 4 Purodha Blissenbach 2007-09-11 21:17:17 UTC
Ok, thanky you, that helpes us a lot!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.