Last modified: 2011-04-14 15:10:56 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 11281 - Allow more/fewer than 200 pages to be viewed at once in a category
Allow more/fewer than 200 pages to be viewed at once in a category
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Categories (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Low enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-09-10 23:24 UTC by Gurch
Modified: 2011-04-14 15:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Gurch 2007-09-10 23:24:52 UTC
It would be nice if the contents of categories could be viewed X pages at a time, for some X other than 200.

Implementation of this would probably best be done in such a way that it matches what is already available for certain special pages (such as [[Special:Contributions]]) - a "limit" parameter in the URL, and a series of links next to the "previous 200" and "next 200" links to change the number of items per page.

If the 5,000-item limit applicable to those special pages is feasible here, great; if not, use whatever is acceptable. I certainly don't think that the limit needs to be more than 5,000 items.
Comment 1 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) 2011-01-15 01:09:35 UTC
Note, $wgCategoryPagingLimit can be set in LocalSettings.php for something other then 200, but it sounds like you're looking for a non-hard coded limit.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links