Last modified: 2007-07-12 00:26:50 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 10547 - Non-working tag <link rel="search">
Non-working tag <link rel="search">
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Interface (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-07-11 23:55 UTC by Sergey Leschina
Modified: 2007-07-12 00:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Sergey Leschina 2007-07-11 23:55:11 UTC
This link at all pages open default XML-page with such context:
<pre>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<OpenSearchDescription xmlns="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/">
<ShortName>Wikipedia (English)</ShortName>
<Description>Wikipedia (English)</Description>
<Image height="16" width="16" type="image/x-icon">http://en.wikipedia.org/favicon.ico</Image>
<Url type="text/html" method="get" template="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;search={searchTerms}"/>
<Url type="application/x-suggestions+json" method="GET" template="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=opensearch&amp;search={searchTerms}"/>
</OpenSearchDescription>
</pre>
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-07-12 00:26:50 UTC
Um, what?  This is an [[OpenSearch]] specification and it seems to be correct and well-formed.  What's wrong with it?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links