Last modified: 2007-09-08 22:45:22 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 10241 - Restrict editing to Image & image_talk namespaces on eswiki
Restrict editing to Image & image_talk namespaces on eswiki
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
Site requests (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedi...
: shell
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-06-13 13:20 UTC by Platonides
Modified: 2007-09-08 22:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Platonides 2007-06-13 13:20:29 UTC
On es.wikipedia we have completed migrating our images to Commons. Thus Image namespaces don't have now utility and are only edited by vandals, so they should be made only editable by sysops.

$wgNamespaceProtection[ NS_IMAGE ] = array( 'editinterface' );
$wgNamespaceProtection[ NS_IMAGE_TALK ] = array( 'editinterface' );


Or in a SiteConfiguration format:

'wgNamespaceProtection' => array(
  'default' = array(NS_MEDIAWIKI => array( 'editinterface' )),
  'eswiki' = array(NS_MEDIAWIKI => array( 'editinterface' ), NS_IMAGE => array( 'editinterface' ), NS_IMAGE_TALK => array( 'editinterface' ) )
);



PS: Once vandal editing is blocked, updating the Statistics would be nice. Now we have -1,396 files uploaded ;-)
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2007-06-13 14:56:49 UTC
It's not the case that they're useless; local information can be written there to supplement the commons data.
Comment 2 Platonides 2007-06-13 21:05:32 UTC
No, the descriptions shall be on commons.
For the strange cases where we really need a local information not for other projects, sysops can set it.

The doubt can be if only sysops can edit it or also autoconfirmed but people seem inclined to sysops-only.
Comment 3 JeLuF 2007-09-08 22:45:22 UTC
Done.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links