Last modified: 2014-08-05 07:08:50 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 10153 - Strange off-by-one error in Special:Unusedimages at offset 43500 with 500 limit
Strange off-by-one error in Special:Unusedimages at offset 43500 with 500 limit
Status: NEW
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
Special pages (Other open bugs)
All All
: Lowest minor (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-06-05 21:42 UTC by Autocracy
Modified: 2014-08-05 07:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Description Autocracy 2007-06-05 21:42:50 UTC
Problematic for a quick script that intends to check how many images are unused. 499 images are listed on this page, and others have viewed the URL to the same results. All prior pages are 500, and several after have 500.
Comment 1 Autocracy 2007-06-05 21:43:37 UTC
I put the url in the url field above, but just to make it clear...
Comment 2 Autocracy 2007-06-05 21:58:51 UTC
Tested the deletion of an image in that range... page showed 499 images again after an image in the displayed range was deleted. Deleted image was not displayed.
Comment 3 Andre Klapper 2014-04-22 07:41:35 UTC shows no results for me (same for cs and de). 
Do I need special rights for this? :-/
Comment 4 C. Scott Ananian 2014-05-29 20:44:49 UTC
I think the algorithm should always be to add the number of images fetched to the offset and retry the API query until it returns 0 images, not to rely on the limit being matched exactly.  As comment 2 is hinting, concurrent deletes can cause underfull replies.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.