Last modified: 2011-03-13 17:46:07 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia has migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports should be created and updated in Wikimedia Phabricator instead. Please create an account in Phabricator and add your Bugzilla email address to it.
Wikimedia Bugzilla is read-only. If you try to edit or create any bug report in Bugzilla you will be shown an intentional error message.
In order to access the Phabricator task corresponding to a Bugzilla report, just remove "static-" from its URL.
You could still run searches in Bugzilla or access your list of votes but bug reports will obviously not be up-to-date in Bugzilla.
Bug 10125 - Install Special:Nuke on TestWiki
Install Special:Nuke on TestWiki
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: Wikimedia
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Lowest normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
http://test.wikipedia.org/
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-06-03 19:35 UTC by Thunderhead
Modified: 2011-03-13 17:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---


Attachments

Description Thunderhead 2007-06-03 19:35:23 UTC
A user, Betacommandbot, has created over 7,000 pages on the Test Wikipedia, each with the content [[Category:Uber large category]], or something to that sort. I am a sysop on that project, and I would like to request that the Nuke extention be installed temporarily to help deal with those pages. Thank you.
Comment 1 Brion Vibber 2007-06-04 19:39:40 UTC
...
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-06-04 22:28:18 UTC
It's a test wiki.  It's good for it to have a large category.  To, you know, test stuff.

...
Comment 3 Casey Brown 2007-06-07 20:45:55 UTC
Same comment as I put on Meta: Thunderhead... that bot isn't a vandal, it's a ''test-wiki''.  Read: ''not a sandbox'', but a test-wiki...  The bot was testing the effects of a large category and how it was rendered.  But it really doesn't matter why he did it, it's a test-wiki, he was testing the features of the database.  Please do not call him or his bot a vandal.  I don't understand why you are making such a big deal about this, did you even contact the owner?
Comment 4 Casey Brown 2007-06-07 23:32:47 UTC
I'm re-opening this for a different reason than it was originally intended in principle.  Technically, test-wiki *should* have Special:Nuke because of the normal content there.  We just need to educate our sysops on its proper use.  Thunderhead really should have contacted the user first.  I have contacted him and he says it is fine if they are nuked. 
Comment 5 Thunderhead 2007-07-12 02:48:36 UTC
Casey, yes I did contact the owner, who said he was "nuking" the content, which never happened.
Comment 6 Thunderhead 2007-07-12 02:53:21 UTC
Though I did not contact him in a civil way, which I regret. I admit I could have indeed been more civil in contacting him about the bot, though the test wiki runs on Wikimedia servers. A simple "ddfafa" takes up server space and adds to the job queue, which shouldn't be very high, no matter where, IMO.

Thunderhead
Comment 7 Aaron Schulz 2007-07-12 02:54:37 UTC
Test edits for category stuff on a test wiki.
Comment 8 Casey Brown 2007-07-12 02:56:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Casey, yes I did contact the owner, who said he was "nuking" the content, which
> never happened.
> 

He deleted the content after I asked him. :-/  Please also keep in mind that
this post was from over a month ago. :-P
Comment 9 Mark A. Hershberger 2011-03-13 17:46:07 UTC
Changing all WONTFIX high priority bugs to lowest priority (no mail should be generated since I turned it off for this.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Navigation
Links