Last modified: 2008-01-23 16:24:45 UTC

Wikimedia Bugzilla is closed!

Wikimedia migrated from Bugzilla to Phabricator. Bug reports are handled in Wikimedia Phabricator.
This static website is read-only and for historical purposes. It is not possible to log in and except for displaying bug reports and their history, links might be broken. See T12079, the corresponding Phabricator task for complete and up-to-date bug report information.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 10079 - Expiring protection should not cancel previous protections
Expiring protection should not cancel previous protections
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 12656
Product: MediaWiki
Classification: Unclassified
General/Unknown (Other open bugs)
unspecified
All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody - You can work on this!
:
: 12248 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-05-31 01:07 UTC by CBM
Modified: 2008-01-23 16:24 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Assignee Huggle Beta Tester: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description CBM 2007-05-31 01:07:47 UTC 
Request: when full protection expires on an article, the previous indefinite protection should resume. The fact that temporary full protection causes permanent move protection to be lost is a continuing problem on en.wikipedia
Comment 1 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-12-18 18:28:45 UTC 
*** Bug 12248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Aryeh Gregor (not reading bugmail, please e-mail directly) 2007-12-18 18:29:20 UTC 
Doesn't just apply to full vs. semi, also to edit vs. move.
Comment 3 Daniel Friesen 2008-01-23 16:24:45 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12656 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.

Navigation
Links